Archive for 2006

The race for the Speaker of the Texas House

Saturday, December 30th, 2006

It is interesting to note the 17 Democrats who are supporting Speaker Craddick. Many of them are of course, Committee Chairs and feel they owe the Speaker something. And the Gossips notice a large number of these good Democrats are either African-Americans or Hispanics. A third are Black and another third are Hispanic. Now why would these 17 Democrats continue to support the most right wing Speaker in the history of the Texas House? After all there are at least two Republicans now in this race who are more moderate members of the House. Is being a Committee Chair or the Speaker Pro Tem so important that you put your personal interests ahead of the interest of the State of Texas? What has this Speaker done for those voters who live in these member’s districts and who are the poorest of our citizens? The Gossips think it is time to put the State of Texas interest at the ahead of the line.

The Democrats who have said in public that they are supporting Craddick are:

1. Kevin Bailey 2. Norma Chavez 3. Joe D. Deshotel 4. Dawnna Dukes 5. Harold Dutton 6. Ismael “Kino” Flores 7. Helen Gidding 8. Ryan Guillen 9. Chuck Hopson 10. Tracy O. King 11. Armando “Mando” Martinez 12. Ruth McClendon 13. Aaron Pena 14. Robert Puente 15. Richard Raymond 16. Patrick M. Rose 17. Sylvester Turner

,

Craig Varoga runs Tom Vilsack campaign

Friday, December 8th, 2006

Tom Vilsack the Governor of Iowa has announced his candidacy for President. He is someone you should take a look at and the Gossips are giving him a good look due to his history and his campaign manager. He has the best campaign manager the Gossip has ever worked for running his campaign. His name? Craig Varoga. Craig Varoga, who lives in Houston, was very much involved in Wesley Clark’s short run for President, in 2004 but his history of running winning campaigns goes way back to the 1990’s when he first ran Bob Lanier’s winning race for Mayor of Houston. Add Ken Bentsen, Lee Brown and numerous other winning races and you will know why Varoga should not be taken lightly. He also was involved with Tom Vilsack’s two winning races in Iowa. Taking over an underdog’s race and winning is a Varoga trade mark. He is always prepared for what might happen in a campaign. He believes in team work and in accountability. Varoga can work with the most divergent group of supporters,get mad and keep his humor. Don’t count Vilsack out after all he is very popular in Iowa and another Governor came from way behind to go on to win in Iowa and be elected President…Jimmy Carter.

Charlie Cook and the Democrats

Friday, December 8th, 2006

Charlie Cook of the National Journal has a new poll out which analyses where the Democrats are today in their quest to win the White House in 2008. And not too surprising Barack Obama gets some attention but Hillary Clinton has also gained some ground in the past several months. Senator Obama, an African-American Senator with just 2 years of service is around 20%. That is good but take his support with some concern because it is hard to poll on a Black politician. Folks, especially Democrats like to say they will vote for a minority candidate, but when it comes time to vote in the ballot box they can change their minds.

The rest of the cast of candidates trail the two U.S. Senators. According to Cook: “Former Vice President Al Gore was at 11 percent, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards had 9 percent, and Sens. Joseph Biden of Delaware and John Kerry of Massachusetts each had 4 percent. Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and Russell Feingold of Wisconsin (who has since said he will not run, Govs. Bill Richardson of New Mexico and Tom Vilsack of Iowa and retired Gen. Wesley Clark each had 2 percent or less”.

Don’t count out Bill Richardson and Tom Vilsack. After all the first primary is in Iowa and Vilsack should do well there and Richardson is a great small state campaigner.

Here is Cook’s report:

“By Charlie Cook National Journal Updated: 12:20 p.m. CT Dec 7, 2006

WASHINGTON – While Democratic circles are buzzing with speculation that Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois might jump into the race for the party’s 2008 presidential nomination, little notice is given to the fact that New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s stock has gone up the most in recent months.

In a Cook Political Report/RT Strategies national survey of registered voters last month, 34 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents supported Clinton and 20 percent said they backed Obama from a list including virtually every conceivable contender. Former Vice President Al Gore was at 11 percent, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards had 9 percent, and Sens. Joseph Biden of Delaware and John Kerry of Massachusetts each had 4 percent. Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Christopher Dodd of Connecticut and Russell Feingold of Wisconsin (who has since said he will not run, Govs. Bill Richardson of New Mexico and Tom Vilsack of Iowa and retired Gen. Wesley Clark each had 2 percent or less.

The poll of 728 registered Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents was conducted Nov. 9-12 and had a 3.6-point error margin.

Clinton’s support this time was statistically unchanged from three previous surveys over the last year, when she was at 31 or 32 percent. But if you take Gore, who is not likely to run, out of the mix, Clinton goes from 34 percent to 39 percent, with Obama at 21 percent and no other candidate gaining more than 2 points. For Clinton, that is 8 points better than in the June Cook/RT survey among the same set of contenders, and it is 7 points higher than she was at this point last December.

If both Gore and Obama are out of the mix, Clinton’s support level goes up to 51 percent, 20 points higher than she was in June and 19 points higher than last December.

Clinton’s biggest challenge has long been the question of electability. While quite controversial among Republicans and independents, Clinton’s favorable ratings among Democrats generally run between 66 and 80 percent. The concern within the party has been whether she could win a general election.

To test the saliency of the electability question, Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents were asked this question in Cook/RT surveys in February, August and last month: “Thinking about Hillary Clinton, which of the following two statements comes closer to your opinion? If Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee, I am worried that she cannot win the election for president, or if Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee, she’ll have as good a chance as any Democratic nominee to be elected president.” The answers were rotated each time the question was asked.

In February, 47 percent said Clinton would have as good a chance as any Democrat, while 46 percent expressed concern that she couldn’t win a general election. In August, the numbers were again pretty evenly split again, with 49 percent expressing concern that she couldn’t win a general and 46 percent believing she’d have as good a chance as any.

In the November survey, however, those who thought she’d have as good a chance as any climbed 14 points to 60 percent, and those worried that she couldn’t win dropped 13 points to 36 percent. There was no significant difference between men and women or among those most likely to vote in a Democratic presidential primary. Among that group, 59 percent thought she would have as good a chance as any, while 37 percent worried that she couldn’t win in November.

Obviously this is one just one poll, and that doesn’t make a trend. Having said that, it could well be that before this midterm election, Democrats, having lost two consecutive presidential elections and lost House and Senate seats in two straight elections as well, were filled with self-doubt and probably not in much of a risk-taking mood. But having won majorities in the House, Senate and among governors last month, Democrats probably have a little more starch in their shorts, and that might play to her benefit.

At the same time, race might not be the obstacle for Obama that some would have thought. The full sample of 1,737 registered voters was asked: “As you may know, Barack Obama is a first-term, African-American senator from Illinois. If the Democratic Party nominated Barack Obama for president, regardless of how you personally might vote, how likely is it that among your friends, neighbors and relatives there might be some people who choose not to vote for Obama because he is African-American?”

Just 13 percent said it was either very likely or fairly likely that they knew someone who would not vote for Obama because of his race, 78 percent said it was only somewhat likely or not likely that they knew someone who would. Interestingly, 23 percent of African-Americans said they knew someone that wouldn’t; only 11 percent of whites said that.

The full survey, which had an error margin of 2.4 points, showed Clinton gaining ground in a hypothetical general election race against Arizona Sen. John McCain, the likely front-runner for the GOP nomination. The poll showed McCain with 44 percent and Clinton with 42 percent. McCain led Clinton by 12 points in February, 9 points in April and 7 points in June.

In the most recent poll, McCain led Obama, 44 percent to 37 percent. This is the first time this pairing has been tested in the Cook/RT poll”

Shelley Sekula Gibbs gives the 22nd a bad name.

Friday, November 17th, 2006

Talk about bad publicity, Shelley Sekula Gibbs is getting it in spades. The Washington Post and Roll Call along with the N.Y. Times and the Houston Chronicle are all reporting on the bad impression she is making in D.C. The Chron said in its editorial “If Sekula-Gibbs hoped to burnish her reputation as a lawmaker in order to run for the seat in 2008, alienating the staff that served the district when DeLay was in office was a very poor strategy. If she runs for the seat again, Houstonians will be reminded that in resigning her council seat only to win fleeting, unflattering national exposure, she cost city taxpayers approximately $1 million to stage a special election to choose her replacement.” Of course the Gossips have tried to warn folks about Shelley Sekula (insert all husbands former names) Gibbs. This is the same person who flip flopped on several issue during her various campaigns and was notorious at Houston City Hall for being hard to work with and only interested in her own press for most of her time in office. She is a Doctor who refused to accept Medicare folks in her practice for a period of time. And you can almost hear the medical community talking about her actions in DC and comparing it to her medical practice in Houston, as she is not on many “favorite doctors lists”. So, perhaps her actions will assure that some other Republican get the chance to run against Nick Lampson in 2008.

The Gossips imagine that Paul Bettencourt is having a ball complying the press clippings on Mrs. Gibbs. So will some state senators and state representatives who might like to more up to Congress. Robert Talton, Charley Howard and Mike Jackson would be names to consider.